https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198358 Purchasers who acquired property during the pendency of partition proceedings were held not entitled to impleadment, because a transfer pendente lite is subject to Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act and cannot prejudice the rights of the existing litigants. A plea of bona fide purchase did not improve their position, since their rights could not exceed those of their vendors. The Court also referred to surrounding circumstances affecting any claim to equity, including a dispute over the same property and a related auction sale found to have been vitiated by fraud. The refusal to implead the transferees was therefore sustained. en-us Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:54:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198358 Purchasers who acquired property during the pendency of partition proceedings were held not entitled to impleadment, because a transfer pendente lite is subject to Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act and cannot prejudice the rights of the existing litigants. A plea of bona fide purchase did not improve their position, since their rights could not exceed those of their vendors. The Court also referred to surrounding circumstances affecting any claim to equity, including a dispute over the same property and a related auction sale found to have been vitiated by fraud. The refusal to implead the transferees was therefore sustained. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198358