<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 800 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198354</link>
    <description>Interim mandatory injunction is granted only in exceptional cases to restore the status quo ante, not to change an existing course of dealings. Because the plaintiffs sought to alter the arrangement for MRV returns rather than preserve it, the requested interim relief was refused. The dispute was also characterised as one concerning the internal management and accounts of the company, and proceedings under section 397 of the Companies Act, 1956 were already pending before the Company Law Board. The matter was therefore left to that statutory forum, and the application for interim relief was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 800 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198354</link>
      <description>Interim mandatory injunction is granted only in exceptional cases to restore the status quo ante, not to change an existing course of dealings. Because the plaintiffs sought to alter the arrangement for MRV returns rather than preserve it, the requested interim relief was refused. The dispute was also characterised as one concerning the internal management and accounts of the company, and proceedings under section 397 of the Companies Act, 1956 were already pending before the Company Law Board. The matter was therefore left to that statutory forum, and the application for interim relief was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>