https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198350 A document described as a relinquishment deed was treated according to its substance, which showed a transfer of rights in immovable property. Because it was unregistered, it attracted compulsory registration and was inadmissible as substantive evidence. It was also held to be insufficiently stamped. In that setting, applications for handwriting comparison and for impounding were refused as serving no useful purpose, since the document could not be relied on for its principal evidentiary use. An inadmissible document may be rejected by the trial court under Order 13 Rules 3 and 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. en-us Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:59:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198350 A document described as a relinquishment deed was treated according to its substance, which showed a transfer of rights in immovable property. Because it was unregistered, it attracted compulsory registration and was inadmissible as substantive evidence. It was also held to be insufficiently stamped. In that setting, applications for handwriting comparison and for impounding were refused as serving no useful purpose, since the document could not be relied on for its principal evidentiary use. An inadmissible document may be rejected by the trial court under Order 13 Rules 3 and 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198350