https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198346 Leave to institute a suit under Section 92 CPC was held valid where the words "subject to just exceptions" were read only as reserving the defendants' right to contest, not as making the leave provisional. The plaint was also found to disclose a representative public trust dispute, because allegations of breach of trust, mismanagement, alienation of trust property and misappropriation were sufficient at the threshold, and the plaintiffs showed a sufficient existing interest as residents and worshippers connected with the trust. The plaint was not rejected for want of cause of action, since the pleaded defect was curable, and amendment under Order VI Rule 17 was allowed before rejection under Order VII Rule 11. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198346 Leave to institute a suit under Section 92 CPC was held valid where the words "subject to just exceptions" were read only as reserving the defendants' right to contest, not as making the leave provisional. The plaint was also found to disclose a representative public trust dispute, because allegations of breach of trust, mismanagement, alienation of trust property and misappropriation were sufficient at the threshold, and the plaintiffs showed a sufficient existing interest as residents and worshippers connected with the trust. The plaint was not rejected for want of cause of action, since the pleaded defect was curable, and amendment under Order VI Rule 17 was allowed before rejection under Order VII Rule 11. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198346