<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 875 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198338</link>
    <description>Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended, is not mandatory in every complaint case; the Magistrate&#039;s duty to inquire into an residing beyond jurisdiction arises only after the Magistrate first exercises discretion to postpone issuance of process. The provision operates within the Chapter XV scheme alongside Sections 200, 203 and 204, and does not curtail the Magistrate&#039;s power to examine the complainant and decide whether to issue process or dismiss the complaint. Procedural non-compliance, without a statutory consequence or failure of justice, does not by itself vitiate the proceeding. On that basis, the revisional order setting aside process was held unsustainable and the Magistrate&#039;s order restoring process was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 16:10:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 875 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198338</link>
      <description>Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended, is not mandatory in every complaint case; the Magistrate&#039;s duty to inquire into an residing beyond jurisdiction arises only after the Magistrate first exercises discretion to postpone issuance of process. The provision operates within the Chapter XV scheme alongside Sections 200, 203 and 204, and does not curtail the Magistrate&#039;s power to examine the complainant and decide whether to issue process or dismiss the complaint. Procedural non-compliance, without a statutory consequence or failure of justice, does not by itself vitiate the proceeding. On that basis, the revisional order setting aside process was held unsustainable and the Magistrate&#039;s order restoring process was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>