https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198323 A privately owned and privately managed non-statutory medical college was treated as outside certiorari because such writs lie only against bodies under a duty to act judicially. The college was also held not to be an instrumentality or agency of the State under Article 12, as the control exercised through the Medical Council and the University was regulatory rather than deep and pervasive. Regulation II of the Medical Council of India was regarded as directory, so it did not create an enforceable public duty for mandamus. Article 29(2) was construed as a limited anti-discrimination guarantee, not a general right to merit-based admission in aided private institutions. en-us Thu, 09 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:27:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198323 A privately owned and privately managed non-statutory medical college was treated as outside certiorari because such writs lie only against bodies under a duty to act judicially. The college was also held not to be an instrumentality or agency of the State under Article 12, as the control exercised through the Medical Council and the University was regulatory rather than deep and pervasive. Regulation II of the Medical Council of India was regarded as directory, so it did not create an enforceable public duty for mandamus. Article 29(2) was construed as a limited anti-discrimination guarantee, not a general right to merit-based admission in aided private institutions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198323