https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198322 A school employee's resignation under the Delhi School Education Act had to be accepted within the statutory period with the Director's approval, and withdrawal was effective only if proved to have reached the school before valid acceptance. The alleged withdrawal letter was found not to have been received, so the employee could not rely on it to defeat the acceptance. The relieving date in the acceptance letter did not preserve any right to withdraw after acceptance had already taken effect, and a telegram asserting earlier withdrawal was insufficient on the facts. The departmental instruction on resolutions by circulation was treated as directory and did not invalidate the managing committee's action. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:24:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198322 A school employee's resignation under the Delhi School Education Act had to be accepted within the statutory period with the Director's approval, and withdrawal was effective only if proved to have reached the school before valid acceptance. The alleged withdrawal letter was found not to have been received, so the employee could not rely on it to defeat the acceptance. The relieving date in the acceptance letter did not preserve any right to withdraw after acceptance had already taken effect, and a telegram asserting earlier withdrawal was insufficient on the facts. The departmental instruction on resolutions by circulation was treated as directory and did not invalidate the managing committee's action. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198322