<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 984 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198315</link>
    <description>After the amendment to Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, an enquiry became obligatory for the Magistrate in the circumstances covered by the provision before taking cognizance. On the facts, the transfer of the complaint proceedings was consistent with that legal position and was sustained. The adverse remarks against the Judicial Officer were unnecessary and were deleted. The direction permitting the Chief Judicial Magistrate to record further sworn statements if required was also found proper, and no interference was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 984 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198315</link>
      <description>After the amendment to Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, an enquiry became obligatory for the Magistrate in the circumstances covered by the provision before taking cognizance. On the facts, the transfer of the complaint proceedings was consistent with that legal position and was sustained. The adverse remarks against the Judicial Officer were unnecessary and were deleted. The direction permitting the Chief Judicial Magistrate to record further sworn statements if required was also found proper, and no interference was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>