https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198309 Prior registered trade mark rights and established prior use protected the plaintiff against the defendant's adoption of Cleanzo or Praveen Cleanzo on similar goods. The plaintiff's registration, renewal, advertisements, invoices and official records supported prima facie prior adoption, while the defendant's alleged earlier use was not substantiated. Similarity of the goods, trade channels and overall get-up, together with deceptively similar labelling, created a likelihood of confusion; differences in classification and the addition of the prefix Praveen did not avoid infringement or passing off where the essential features of the registered mark were taken. The interlocutory protection was therefore maintained and the defendant was restrained from using Cleanzo in any form. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jan 2018 11:44:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198309 Prior registered trade mark rights and established prior use protected the plaintiff against the defendant's adoption of Cleanzo or Praveen Cleanzo on similar goods. The plaintiff's registration, renewal, advertisements, invoices and official records supported prima facie prior adoption, while the defendant's alleged earlier use was not substantiated. Similarity of the goods, trade channels and overall get-up, together with deceptively similar labelling, created a likelihood of confusion; differences in classification and the addition of the prefix Praveen did not avoid infringement or passing off where the essential features of the registered mark were taken. The interlocutory protection was therefore maintained and the defendant was restrained from using Cleanzo in any form. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198309