<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1478 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198306</link>
    <description>An ITAT appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because the assessee neither appeared at the hearing nor sought adjournment, leading the Tribunal to infer lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Relying on the principle that an appeal must be actively prosecuted, the Tribunal exercised inherent power to treat the appeal as unadmitted and dismiss it. The assessee was given liberty to seek recall of the order on showing sufficient cause for non-appearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 11:19:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1478 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198306</link>
      <description>An ITAT appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because the assessee neither appeared at the hearing nor sought adjournment, leading the Tribunal to infer lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Relying on the principle that an appeal must be actively prosecuted, the Tribunal exercised inherent power to treat the appeal as unadmitted and dismiss it. The assessee was given liberty to seek recall of the order on showing sufficient cause for non-appearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>