<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1221 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198302</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the validity of an attachment order dated April 21, 2007, and the legitimacy of a transaction between the appellants and M/s. Arsh International Chemical Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed. The court held that the transaction was void under Sections 536(2) and 537(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, as it occurred after the winding-up petition was filed. The court found that the transaction was not in good faith as the directors were aware of the winding-up proceedings and attempted to keep valuable assets from the court and Official Liquidator. The appellants were advised to pursue substantive proceedings for appropriate declarations and reliefs regarding their title.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 10:26:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1221 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198302</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the validity of an attachment order dated April 21, 2007, and the legitimacy of a transaction between the appellants and M/s. Arsh International Chemical Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed. The court held that the transaction was void under Sections 536(2) and 537(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, as it occurred after the winding-up petition was filed. The court found that the transaction was not in good faith as the directors were aware of the winding-up proceedings and attempted to keep valuable assets from the court and Official Liquidator. The appellants were advised to pursue substantive proceedings for appropriate declarations and reliefs regarding their title.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>