<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 74 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11623</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the respondent-company was not liable to interest-tax before the insertion of section 2(5B)(va) and was not considered a financial company as defined in the Interest-tax Act. The court held that the respondent did not meet the criteria to be classified as a miscellaneous finance company under section 2(5B)(vi) based on its business activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 74 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11623</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the respondent-company was not liable to interest-tax before the insertion of section 2(5B)(va) and was not considered a financial company as defined in the Interest-tax Act. The court held that the respondent did not meet the criteria to be classified as a miscellaneous finance company under section 2(5B)(vi) based on its business activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>