https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198290 The Supreme Court clarified the temporal scope of its earlier restraint order and held that subsidy claims by wood-based industries for transport undertaken before 7 May 2002 were not covered by that restraint. The clarification removed doubt on the payment position for pre-order claims and confirmed that such claims could be paid. The ruling turned on the date of the transport activity relative to the court's order, rather than on any broader limitation on subsidy entitlement. en-us Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:27:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198290 The Supreme Court clarified the temporal scope of its earlier restraint order and held that subsidy claims by wood-based industries for transport undertaken before 7 May 2002 were not covered by that restraint. The clarification removed doubt on the payment position for pre-order claims and confirmed that such claims could be paid. The ruling turned on the date of the transport activity relative to the court's order, rather than on any broader limitation on subsidy entitlement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198290