https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198279 Where an arbitration agreement fixes a contractual time limit for publishing the award, expiry of that period without a valid joint extension ends the arbitrator's mandate and renders a belated award unsustainable. Waiver under Section 4 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot revive a lapsed jurisdiction, and later ministerial acts after the hearing has concluded do not amount to clear participation or implied consent. The delayed award was therefore liable to be set aside, and the Section 34 challenge remained maintainable. en-us Wed, 02 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:34:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198279 Where an arbitration agreement fixes a contractual time limit for publishing the award, expiry of that period without a valid joint extension ends the arbitrator's mandate and renders a belated award unsustainable. Waiver under Section 4 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot revive a lapsed jurisdiction, and later ministerial acts after the hearing has concluded do not amount to clear participation or implied consent. The delayed award was therefore liable to be set aside, and the Section 34 challenge remained maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198279