https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198274 The court dismissed the appeal, finding that the arbitrator had acted within the scope of the reference to arbitration, the letter dated 15-7-1996 did not modify the agreed terms, and the finding on the shortage of 1350 M.T. was supported by evidence. The appellants' failure to object to the scope of arbitration regarding the second shipment and the lack of reference to the charter party document regarding the loading quantity were key factors in the court's decision to dismiss the appeal. en-us Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:23:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198274 The court dismissed the appeal, finding that the arbitrator had acted within the scope of the reference to arbitration, the letter dated 15-7-1996 did not modify the agreed terms, and the finding on the shortage of 1350 M.T. was supported by evidence. The appellants' failure to object to the scope of arbitration regarding the second shipment and the lack of reference to the charter party document regarding the loading quantity were key factors in the court's decision to dismiss the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198274