<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 581 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198273</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the decrees of the lower courts and decreeing the suit as prayed for by the appellant. The Court held that the dispute over damages due to disconnection is not arbitrable under the Electricity Act or the Supply Act. Additionally, the civil court has jurisdiction to decide the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2018 12:17:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 581 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198273</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the decrees of the lower courts and decreeing the suit as prayed for by the appellant. The Court held that the dispute over damages due to disconnection is not arbitrable under the Electricity Act or the Supply Act. Additionally, the civil court has jurisdiction to decide the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>