<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 982 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198268</link>
    <description>The Court permitted the Special Investigation Team to continue until completion of the riot trials and recognised that further investigation could proceed in law, including by supplementary charge-sheets under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. To secure a fair and speedy trial, it directed witness protection, consultation with the Special Investigation Team for appointment or replacement of experienced public prosecutors, designation of courts for day-to-day hearing, and continued supervisory reporting. The ruling treats continued investigation, prosecutorial strengthening and trial management as necessary safeguards where witness intimidation and public confidence in criminal justice are at stake.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 982 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198268</link>
      <description>The Court permitted the Special Investigation Team to continue until completion of the riot trials and recognised that further investigation could proceed in law, including by supplementary charge-sheets under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. To secure a fair and speedy trial, it directed witness protection, consultation with the Special Investigation Team for appointment or replacement of experienced public prosecutors, designation of courts for day-to-day hearing, and continued supervisory reporting. The ruling treats continued investigation, prosecutorial strengthening and trial management as necessary safeguards where witness intimidation and public confidence in criminal justice are at stake.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>