https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198265 The repeal of the 1949 amending Act did not extinguish section 6(1-A) inserted into the Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933, because the repeal-saving language in the 1952 Repealing and Amending Act did not apply to an amendment made by a later Act to a principal Act. Section 6-A of the General Clauses Act, 1897 preserved the amendment unless a contrary legislative intention appeared, and no such intention was shown. Section 6(1-A) therefore remained operative when the offence was committed, sustaining the conviction and sentence. en-us Tue, 15 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:38:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198265 The repeal of the 1949 amending Act did not extinguish section 6(1-A) inserted into the Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933, because the repeal-saving language in the 1952 Repealing and Amending Act did not apply to an amendment made by a later Act to a principal Act. Section 6-A of the General Clauses Act, 1897 preserved the amendment unless a contrary legislative intention appeared, and no such intention was shown. Section 6(1-A) therefore remained operative when the offence was committed, sustaining the conviction and sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198265