https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198261 The court held that the petitioner's right to arbitration could not be extinguished by the 180-day limitation clause in the Agreement. The court appointed Shri B.R. Gupta, Addl. District Judge (Retd.), as the Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The court found that the amended Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 applied to the case, allowing the petitioner to pursue arbitration despite the contractual limitation period. en-us Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198261 The court held that the petitioner's right to arbitration could not be extinguished by the 180-day limitation clause in the Agreement. The court appointed Shri B.R. Gupta, Addl. District Judge (Retd.), as the Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The court found that the amended Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 applied to the case, allowing the petitioner to pursue arbitration despite the contractual limitation period. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198261