https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198255 An amendment inserted into Section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure continued to operate after repeal of the amending Act because the proviso had already been incorporated into the principal Code and became part of it. The repeal did not remove an embedded provision, and Section 4 of the Repealing and Amending Act preserved enactments where the repealed law had been applied, incorporated or referred to. The repeal was directed at obsolete matter, not provisions already embedded in another statute. The maintenance order founded on the inserted proviso therefore remained undisturbed. en-us Wed, 18 Aug 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:00:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198255 An amendment inserted into Section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure continued to operate after repeal of the amending Act because the proviso had already been incorporated into the principal Code and became part of it. The repeal did not remove an embedded provision, and Section 4 of the Repealing and Amending Act preserved enactments where the repealed law had been applied, incorporated or referred to. The repeal was directed at obsolete matter, not provisions already embedded in another statute. The maintenance order founded on the inserted proviso therefore remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Aug 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198255