<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1157 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the addition of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the finding that the assessee was not a shareholder in the payer company, M/s Beehive Technologies Private Limited, from which the payment was received. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the unjustified addition, emphasizing the requirement of shareholding for the application of Section 2(22)(e).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2018 08:42:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1157 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the addition of deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the finding that the assessee was not a shareholder in the payer company, M/s Beehive Technologies Private Limited, from which the payment was received. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the unjustified addition, emphasizing the requirement of shareholding for the application of Section 2(22)(e).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>