<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1156 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354420</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify whether the assessee received the consideration by non-cash modes on the date of the agreement in 2006. If proven, the valuation date for capital gains computation should be the agreement date, not the registration date in 2010. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes pending verification, with the order pronounced on 24.01.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2018 08:42:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1156 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354420</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify whether the assessee received the consideration by non-cash modes on the date of the agreement in 2006. If proven, the valuation date for capital gains computation should be the agreement date, not the registration date in 2010. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes pending verification, with the order pronounced on 24.01.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>