<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1153 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the cross objection of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition sustained by the CIT(A). The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, noting the lack of independent inquiry by the AO and reliance solely on information from the Central Excise Department. It emphasized that stock discrepancies were due to human error and inaccurate weighment of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2018 08:39:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1153 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the cross objection of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition sustained by the CIT(A). The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, noting the lack of independent inquiry by the AO and reliance solely on information from the Central Excise Department. It emphasized that stock discrepancies were due to human error and inaccurate weighment of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>