<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1150 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354414</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the addition of unaccounted income received from London Speaker Bureau for attending the Global Leadership Forum. However, it rejected the addition of unaccounted income received from Red Chillies, as the evidence provided aligned with the receipts from Red Chillies, and no concrete evidence was found to support the addition based on loose sheets seized during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2018 08:36:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1150 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354414</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the addition of unaccounted income received from London Speaker Bureau for attending the Global Leadership Forum. However, it rejected the addition of unaccounted income received from Red Chillies, as the evidence provided aligned with the receipts from Red Chillies, and no concrete evidence was found to support the addition based on loose sheets seized during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>