<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1147 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354411</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, holding that the &#039;other income&#039; disclosed and treated as business income must be considered part of income from business for computing book profits. The Court emphasized that the character of income does not change based on the section applied, ruling in favor of the appellant on the substantial question of law regarding the claim under section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1147 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354411</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, holding that the &#039;other income&#039; disclosed and treated as business income must be considered part of income from business for computing book profits. The Court emphasized that the character of income does not change based on the section applied, ruling in favor of the appellant on the substantial question of law regarding the claim under section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>