<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1138 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354402</link>
    <description>The Tribunal emphasized the requirement of a genuine grievance against an assessment for an appeal to be valid. The case was remanded for further investigation by the Commissioner (Appeals) to ascertain the validity of the appellant&#039;s grievance concerning the assessment based on the higher freight amount. The Tribunal noted the lack of clarity regarding the declaration of miscellaneous charges and directed a remand for verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2018 08:18:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1138 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354402</link>
      <description>The Tribunal emphasized the requirement of a genuine grievance against an assessment for an appeal to be valid. The case was remanded for further investigation by the Commissioner (Appeals) to ascertain the validity of the appellant&#039;s grievance concerning the assessment based on the higher freight amount. The Tribunal noted the lack of clarity regarding the declaration of miscellaneous charges and directed a remand for verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>