https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198236 A vague agreement to sell property, lacking certainty on price, timing and the property to be conveyed, was treated as incapable of specific enforcement, and no injunction could arise from any implied negative covenant where none was expressed or necessarily implied. The statutory acquisition of evacuee property was held to extinguish the evacuee's interest and vest the property in the Central Government free from encumbrances, so a private claim to compel sale could not be enforced against it and civil injunction relief was barred. The constitutional challenges under Articles 31 and 14 also failed because the acquisition scheme fell within the applicable evacuee-property framework and had a rational statutory basis. en-us Mon, 14 Jan 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jan 2018 17:59:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198236 A vague agreement to sell property, lacking certainty on price, timing and the property to be conveyed, was treated as incapable of specific enforcement, and no injunction could arise from any implied negative covenant where none was expressed or necessarily implied. The statutory acquisition of evacuee property was held to extinguish the evacuee's interest and vest the property in the Central Government free from encumbrances, so a private claim to compel sale could not be enforced against it and civil injunction relief was barred. The constitutional challenges under Articles 31 and 14 also failed because the acquisition scheme fell within the applicable evacuee-property framework and had a rational statutory basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Jan 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198236