<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (11) TMI 245 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198226</link>
    <description>Section 86 of the Code of Civil Procedure is treated as a statutory modification of sovereign immunity: a foreign State or its department may invoke protection where the materials show that the entity forms part of the governmental machinery and is treated as nationally owned property. The provision extends to suits arising from commercial contracts, so prior consent of the Central Government remains necessary. The consent objection goes to maintainability and should be decided at the threshold before the suit proceeds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:03:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (11) TMI 245 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198226</link>
      <description>Section 86 of the Code of Civil Procedure is treated as a statutory modification of sovereign immunity: a foreign State or its department may invoke protection where the materials show that the entity forms part of the governmental machinery and is treated as nationally owned property. The provision extends to suits arising from commercial contracts, so prior consent of the Central Government remains necessary. The consent objection goes to maintainability and should be decided at the threshold before the suit proceeds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>