https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198225 An order refusing to dismiss a suit in limine on sovereign immunity grounds was treated as a judgment because it finally determined the jurisdictional objection and affected the substantive controversy over the defendant's liability to answer the suit. The commentary also states that a foreign State recognised by the Government of India retained immunity under international law unless it submitted to jurisdiction or waived the privilege, and that Section 86 of the Code of Civil Procedure only modified that doctrine by adding a requirement of prior Central Government consent. On the stated facts, no waiver or consent was shown, so the suit against the foreign State was liable to be dismissed. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:51:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198225 An order refusing to dismiss a suit in limine on sovereign immunity grounds was treated as a judgment because it finally determined the jurisdictional objection and affected the substantive controversy over the defendant's liability to answer the suit. The commentary also states that a foreign State recognised by the Government of India retained immunity under international law unless it submitted to jurisdiction or waived the privilege, and that Section 86 of the Code of Civil Procedure only modified that doctrine by adding a requirement of prior Central Government consent. On the stated facts, no waiver or consent was shown, so the suit against the foreign State was liable to be dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198225