https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198224 The Privy Council allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and dismissing the suit with costs to be paid by the first Respondent. The decision emphasized the significance of concrete evidence in legal proceedings, stating that the burden of proof was not met by the decree-holder regarding allegations of fraud and collusion in the sale of the property. The court found in favor of the purchaser, rejecting claims that the transaction was collusive, fraudulent, or without consideration. en-us Tue, 07 Dec 1920 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198224 The Privy Council allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and dismissing the suit with costs to be paid by the first Respondent. The decision emphasized the significance of concrete evidence in legal proceedings, stating that the burden of proof was not met by the decree-holder regarding allegations of fraud and collusion in the sale of the property. The court found in favor of the purchaser, rejecting claims that the transaction was collusive, fraudulent, or without consideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Dec 1920 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198224