<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11597</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the entitlement to investment allowance under section 32A of the Act for machinery leased out in the business of leasing, citing a previous Supreme Court decision. Additionally, the court held that the expenditure on advertisements inviting fixed deposits from the public was allowable business expenditure as it complied with statutory requirements under the Companies Act, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that it constituted sales promotion expenses under section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act. The judgment extensively analyzed relevant legal provisions, case law, and tax authority circulars to reach a fair outcome supporting the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11597</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the entitlement to investment allowance under section 32A of the Act for machinery leased out in the business of leasing, citing a previous Supreme Court decision. Additionally, the court held that the expenditure on advertisements inviting fixed deposits from the public was allowable business expenditure as it complied with statutory requirements under the Companies Act, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that it constituted sales promotion expenses under section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act. The judgment extensively analyzed relevant legal provisions, case law, and tax authority circulars to reach a fair outcome supporting the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>