<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11596</link>
    <description>Section 269SS and section 271D were applied together to determine the proper basis for penalty where a loan transaction exceeded the cash threshold. The Court accepted that, while penalty is attracted for non-compliance with section 269SS, the permissible amount of Rs. 20,000 must be adjusted in computing the penalty. It also treated the Tribunal&#039;s direction to remand the matter for fresh calculation after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard as legally valid. The order was therefore upheld, and no interference was called for.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 31 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11596</link>
      <description>Section 269SS and section 271D were applied together to determine the proper basis for penalty where a loan transaction exceeded the cash threshold. The Court accepted that, while penalty is attracted for non-compliance with section 269SS, the permissible amount of Rs. 20,000 must be adjusted in computing the penalty. It also treated the Tribunal&#039;s direction to remand the matter for fresh calculation after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard as legally valid. The order was therefore upheld, and no interference was called for.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>