https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198216 A truthful television commercial stating that the plaintiff's soap was not an antiseptic soap was treated as a correction of a mistaken public perception, not actionable disparagement; truth operated as a complete defence to injunctive relief. The plaintiff's claim for injunction was also undermined by its failure to claim damages, suppression of material facts including an earlier regulatory complaint, delay, and the availability of an equally efficacious remedy before the MRTP Commission. On those grounds, equitable relief was refused and the suit was dismissed. en-us Mon, 21 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:49:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198216 A truthful television commercial stating that the plaintiff's soap was not an antiseptic soap was treated as a correction of a mistaken public perception, not actionable disparagement; truth operated as a complete defence to injunctive relief. The plaintiff's claim for injunction was also undermined by its failure to claim damages, suppression of material facts including an earlier regulatory complaint, delay, and the availability of an equally efficacious remedy before the MRTP Commission. On those grounds, equitable relief was refused and the suit was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198216