<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 874 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198212</link>
    <description>Where an arbitrator originally appointed under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act ceases to act, section 15(2) requires the substitute arbitrator to be appointed by the same mode used for the original appointment. Accordingly, if the Chief Justice or designate appointed the original arbitrator, the substitute must also be appointed through that route, not under the contractual appointment mechanism. The other party&#039;s contractual right to appoint an arbitrator does not revive merely because the mandate later terminates or the arbitrator resigns, and any appointment made after section 11 proceedings have begun has no legal effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:15:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 874 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198212</link>
      <description>Where an arbitrator originally appointed under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act ceases to act, section 15(2) requires the substitute arbitrator to be appointed by the same mode used for the original appointment. Accordingly, if the Chief Justice or designate appointed the original arbitrator, the substitute must also be appointed through that route, not under the contractual appointment mechanism. The other party&#039;s contractual right to appoint an arbitrator does not revive merely because the mandate later terminates or the arbitrator resigns, and any appointment made after section 11 proceedings have begun has no legal effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>