<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 431 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198209</link>
    <description>Affidavits filed in support of and in reply to a contempt petition must comply with verification requirements under the Supreme Court Rules and the Code of Civil Procedure. The affidavit must clearly separate facts based on personal knowledge from those based on information and belief, and disclose the source of information where required. A vague, general, or improperly verified affidavit has no probative value, and an affidavit filed through an advocate&#039;s clerk was treated as wholly improper. On that basis, the affidavits were rejected as non-compliant and the contempt petition could not proceed until proper affidavits were filed in accordance with the rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:14:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 431 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198209</link>
      <description>Affidavits filed in support of and in reply to a contempt petition must comply with verification requirements under the Supreme Court Rules and the Code of Civil Procedure. The affidavit must clearly separate facts based on personal knowledge from those based on information and belief, and disclose the source of information where required. A vague, general, or improperly verified affidavit has no probative value, and an affidavit filed through an advocate&#039;s clerk was treated as wholly improper. On that basis, the affidavits were rejected as non-compliant and the contempt petition could not proceed until proper affidavits were filed in accordance with the rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>