<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 786 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198205</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal, as well as the application for condonation of a 14-day delay in the original filing of the appeal. The Court found the applicant&#039;s explanation lacking credibility and emphasized the strict enforcement of the law of limitation. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to legal timelines and the consequences of failing to do so.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:34:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 786 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198205</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal, as well as the application for condonation of a 14-day delay in the original filing of the appeal. The Court found the applicant&#039;s explanation lacking credibility and emphasized the strict enforcement of the law of limitation. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to legal timelines and the consequences of failing to do so.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>