<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1118 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354382</link>
    <description>The court quashed the impugned letters demanding interest on provisionally assessed Bills of Entry, ruling that the demand for additional interest was not justified. It held that the petitioner had complied with the Settlement Commission&#039;s final order, and no further interest was payable. The court directed the Revenue not to act on the letters and made the rule absolute, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1118 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354382</link>
      <description>The court quashed the impugned letters demanding interest on provisionally assessed Bills of Entry, ruling that the demand for additional interest was not justified. It held that the petitioner had complied with the Settlement Commission&#039;s final order, and no further interest was payable. The court directed the Revenue not to act on the letters and made the rule absolute, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>