<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (12) TMI 104 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198201</link>
    <description>Cancellation of a notarial certificate for professional misconduct requires notice that clearly discloses the statutory basis and alleged unfitness to practise. Failure to inform the Notary that the enquiry concerned misconduct warranting disqualification denied a fair opportunity to answer the real allegations and vitiated the cancellation for breach of natural justice. An endorsement after administering an affidavit oath forms part of notarial duties and may require a notarial stamp, but a register-entry finding cannot rest on a rule different from the charge framed. Removal from the register cancels the certificate without permanently barring a future certificate if fitness is later established. The impugned notification was quashed, with fresh lawful action left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:08:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (12) TMI 104 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198201</link>
      <description>Cancellation of a notarial certificate for professional misconduct requires notice that clearly discloses the statutory basis and alleged unfitness to practise. Failure to inform the Notary that the enquiry concerned misconduct warranting disqualification denied a fair opportunity to answer the real allegations and vitiated the cancellation for breach of natural justice. An endorsement after administering an affidavit oath forms part of notarial duties and may require a notarial stamp, but a register-entry finding cannot rest on a rule different from the charge framed. Removal from the register cancels the certificate without permanently barring a future certificate if fitness is later established. The impugned notification was quashed, with fresh lawful action left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>