<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1094 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354358</link>
    <description>Successive petitions under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIRs were held not maintainable where earlier challenges had been dismissed or withdrawn and the later company-court and Supreme Court developments did not produce any factual finding in favour of the petitioners. The Court held that findings in civil or company proceedings do not bind criminal courts because the standards of proof differ, and the later dismissal of related proceedings was not a material ground to interfere with the criminal prosecution. Treating the petitions as a repeated attempt to delay the trial, the Court declined to quash the FIRs or related proceedings and imposed costs for abuse of process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:52:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1094 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354358</link>
      <description>Successive petitions under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIRs were held not maintainable where earlier challenges had been dismissed or withdrawn and the later company-court and Supreme Court developments did not produce any factual finding in favour of the petitioners. The Court held that findings in civil or company proceedings do not bind criminal courts because the standards of proof differ, and the later dismissal of related proceedings was not a material ground to interfere with the criminal prosecution. Treating the petitions as a repeated attempt to delay the trial, the Court declined to quash the FIRs or related proceedings and imposed costs for abuse of process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>