<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1093 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354357</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the tax liability of the respondent for public relation activities under Service Tax. It was held that &#039;media monitoring services&#039; and similar activities did not fall under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) as contended by the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized the separate tax treatment for public relations activities introduced in 2006 and the lack of concrete evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims. The decision highlighted the necessity of clear statutory interpretation and evidence in establishing tax liability, ultimately upholding the original authority&#039;s ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1093 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354357</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the tax liability of the respondent for public relation activities under Service Tax. It was held that &#039;media monitoring services&#039; and similar activities did not fall under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) as contended by the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized the separate tax treatment for public relations activities introduced in 2006 and the lack of concrete evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims. The decision highlighted the necessity of clear statutory interpretation and evidence in establishing tax liability, ultimately upholding the original authority&#039;s ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>