<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1091 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354355</link>
    <description>Export-linked refund claims under Notification No. 17/2009-ST were held maintainable where the competent authority had jurisdiction over the assessee&#039;s registered premises and the Revenue failed to show any contrary jurisdiction. Service tax on transportation from mine to railway siding and onward for export, as well as port-related services, was found within the notification&#039;s scope because the record supported a clear nexus with export movement. Alleged document discrepancies and absence of strict one-to-one correlation did not defeat the claims, since shipping bills, invoices, bills of lading, certificates and other supporting records established the export linkage and no specific mismatch was proved. The refund claims were upheld in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:52:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1091 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354355</link>
      <description>Export-linked refund claims under Notification No. 17/2009-ST were held maintainable where the competent authority had jurisdiction over the assessee&#039;s registered premises and the Revenue failed to show any contrary jurisdiction. Service tax on transportation from mine to railway siding and onward for export, as well as port-related services, was found within the notification&#039;s scope because the record supported a clear nexus with export movement. Alleged document discrepancies and absence of strict one-to-one correlation did not defeat the claims, since shipping bills, invoices, bills of lading, certificates and other supporting records established the export linkage and no specific mismatch was proved. The refund claims were upheld in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>