<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 551 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198199</link>
    <description>An election petition alleging corrupt practice must be accompanied by a prescribed affidavit, and the served copy must be a true copy of the petition including the affidavit&#039;s attestation or verification. Omission of the notary or other prescribed attestation is a material defect because it may mislead the returned candidate about whether the allegations were duly sworn in the required form. In such matters, strict statutory safeguards apply and the doctrine of substantial compliance does not cure a vital omission affecting the character of the copy. The defect therefore goes to maintainability and attracts dismissal at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:45:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=506006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 551 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198199</link>
      <description>An election petition alleging corrupt practice must be accompanied by a prescribed affidavit, and the served copy must be a true copy of the petition including the affidavit&#039;s attestation or verification. Omission of the notary or other prescribed attestation is a material defect because it may mislead the returned candidate about whether the allegations were duly sworn in the required form. In such matters, strict statutory safeguards apply and the doctrine of substantial compliance does not cure a vital omission affecting the character of the copy. The defect therefore goes to maintainability and attracts dismissal at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>