<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 942 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198182</link>
    <description>Self-matched trades where the same client was both buyer and seller through the broker were treated as fictitious and artificial, because a person cannot trade with himself. The trading pattern also showed a pending sell order later matched by a buy order at a higher price, which pushed up price and volume; the trading system was not accepted as a defence where the order placement itself disclosed manipulation. On those facts, violation of the stockbroker and FUTP regulations was established, and the disciplinary penalty was reduced to ten days&#039; suspension.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:54:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 942 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198182</link>
      <description>Self-matched trades where the same client was both buyer and seller through the broker were treated as fictitious and artificial, because a person cannot trade with himself. The trading pattern also showed a pending sell order later matched by a buy order at a higher price, which pushed up price and volume; the trading system was not accepted as a defence where the order placement itself disclosed manipulation. On those facts, violation of the stockbroker and FUTP regulations was established, and the disciplinary penalty was reduced to ten days&#039; suspension.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>