<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 630 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198181</link>
    <description>A purely temporary mid-session clock-hour appointment cannot be treated as a probationary appointment against a permanent vacancy unless the permanent vacancy and legal basis for such conversion are shown under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools regime. The material described no clear permanent vacancy, so a deemed probationary appointment was unsustainable. The text also notes that a School Tribunal cannot entertain an appeal filed beyond the prescribed period without a legally sufficient explanation for delay; where no such cause is shown and no lawful condonation is made, the delayed appeal is not maintainable and jurisdiction is lacking.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:52:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 630 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198181</link>
      <description>A purely temporary mid-session clock-hour appointment cannot be treated as a probationary appointment against a permanent vacancy unless the permanent vacancy and legal basis for such conversion are shown under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools regime. The material described no clear permanent vacancy, so a deemed probationary appointment was unsustainable. The text also notes that a School Tribunal cannot entertain an appeal filed beyond the prescribed period without a legally sufficient explanation for delay; where no such cause is shown and no lawful condonation is made, the delayed appeal is not maintainable and jurisdiction is lacking.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>