<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1289 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198179</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding penalties imposed on the appellants for executing matched and synchronized trades in violation of Securities and Exchange Board of India regulations. The penalty amount for each appellant was standardized at Rs. 3 lakhs, except for one appellant facing an additional penalty for non-compliance, resulting in a penalty of Rs. 4 lakhs. The tribunal found discrepancies in penalty imposition for similar wrongdoings and adjusted the penalties to ensure uniformity among the appellants. The impugned orders were modified accordingly, with no additional costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:39:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1289 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198179</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding penalties imposed on the appellants for executing matched and synchronized trades in violation of Securities and Exchange Board of India regulations. The penalty amount for each appellant was standardized at Rs. 3 lakhs, except for one appellant facing an additional penalty for non-compliance, resulting in a penalty of Rs. 4 lakhs. The tribunal found discrepancies in penalty imposition for similar wrongdoings and adjusted the penalties to ensure uniformity among the appellants. The impugned orders were modified accordingly, with no additional costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>