<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1254 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198176</link>
    <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal upheld the findings against a stock broker accused of executing manipulative circular and reverse trades, including synchronization with the client. The broker was penalized Rs. 4 lacs for engaging in such trading practices, with the Tribunal dismissing the broker&#039;s appeal and affirming the initial decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1254 - THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198176</link>
      <description>The Securities Appellate Tribunal upheld the findings against a stock broker accused of executing manipulative circular and reverse trades, including synchronization with the client. The broker was penalized Rs. 4 lacs for engaging in such trading practices, with the Tribunal dismissing the broker&#039;s appeal and affirming the initial decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>