https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198173 A fixed-term commercial arrangement was treated as having prima facie expired by efflux of time, so the negative covenant could not be enforced independently once the contract had ceased to subsist. Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 was considered conditional on a binding contract and the claimant's own performance, while the arrangement was also regarded as determinable, engaging the bar under Section 14(1)(c) and the related restriction under Section 41(e). On balance of convenience and irreparable injury, the court found the respondent's position stronger and refused interim injunctive relief. en-us Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:38:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198173 A fixed-term commercial arrangement was treated as having prima facie expired by efflux of time, so the negative covenant could not be enforced independently once the contract had ceased to subsist. Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 was considered conditional on a binding contract and the claimant's own performance, while the arrangement was also regarded as determinable, engaging the bar under Section 14(1)(c) and the related restriction under Section 41(e). On balance of convenience and irreparable injury, the court found the respondent's position stronger and refused interim injunctive relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198173