https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198172 The Court held that post-partition, a payment made by a member of a Hindu family does not start a fresh period of limitation against other family members. The liability to pay family debts is personal and limited to individual shares in family properties. Judicial precedents emphasized that after partition, there is no managing member to bind other members by acknowledgment or payment. The case followed the ruling in Pangudaya v. Uthandiya, stating that without a managing member post-partition, a payment by one member cannot affect others' liabilities. As such, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants. en-us Fri, 19 Sep 1941 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:18:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198172 The Court held that post-partition, a payment made by a member of a Hindu family does not start a fresh period of limitation against other family members. The liability to pay family debts is personal and limited to individual shares in family properties. Judicial precedents emphasized that after partition, there is no managing member to bind other members by acknowledgment or payment. The case followed the ruling in Pangudaya v. Uthandiya, stating that without a managing member post-partition, a payment by one member cannot affect others' liabilities. As such, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Sep 1941 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198172