<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 24 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11579</link>
    <description>HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings that the Assessing Officer&#039;s inquiries, including bank verification, legitimately cast doubt on the genuineness of the alleged gift from an unrelated third party. The court found no merit in the claim that the assessee was denied a proper opportunity to prove the gift, and concluded the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions warranted no interference. The challenge to the assessment was therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 11:41:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 24 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11579</link>
      <description>HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings that the Assessing Officer&#039;s inquiries, including bank verification, legitimately cast doubt on the genuineness of the alleged gift from an unrelated third party. The court found no merit in the claim that the assessee was denied a proper opportunity to prove the gift, and concluded the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions warranted no interference. The challenge to the assessment was therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>