https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198163 The Privy Council allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court's decision and reinstating the District Judge's order. The court held that the suit was not solely for the benefit of the minor plaintiffs and determined that the properties listed in Schedule 1 were the appellant's separate properties, not joint family assets. The appellant successfully demonstrated that the properties were self-acquired, and the burden of proof lay with the party claiming joint family ownership. The costs of the appeal were to be borne by the respondents. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 1947 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jan 2018 14:25:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198163 The Privy Council allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court's decision and reinstating the District Judge's order. The court held that the suit was not solely for the benefit of the minor plaintiffs and determined that the properties listed in Schedule 1 were the appellant's separate properties, not joint family assets. The appellant successfully demonstrated that the properties were self-acquired, and the burden of proof lay with the party claiming joint family ownership. The costs of the appeal were to be borne by the respondents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Jul 1947 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198163